By Sarah D. Pinsonnault As a general rule, under article 68(1) of the Québec Code of Civil Procedure (“C.C.P”), a personal action must be instituted before the competent court of the defendant’s real or elected domicile. When the territorial jurisdiction of the judicial district is put into question by the defendant, via a motion for declinatory exception, the plaintiff must then prove that one of the exceptional cases set forth in the subsequent paragraphs of art. 68 C.C.P. applies. In Pomerleau et Adornetto, 2014 QCCS 3899, the Plaintiffs, alleging to have been the victims of slanderous remarks on one of their Facebook pages, instituted a defamation lawsuit in the judicial district of Beauce; the district where they were domiciled. The Defendant however, who lives in Boisbriand, presented a motion for declinatory exception so that the Plaintiffs’ motion, in accordance with article 68(1) C.C.P., be transferred to the judicial district of… Lire la suite
Étiquette : Internet
Alleged Victim of Defamation Goes After the Accessibility of Online Newspaper Archives
By Sarah D. PinsonnaultRevenu Québec In Lavoie c. Vailles (2013 QCCS 3911), the Plaintiff instituted a motion against the Defendants, the newspaper La Presse and one of its journalists, for having published allegedly defamatory articles about him. One of the conclusions he sought was a safeguard order whereby La Presse would have to, inter alia, immediately remove said articles from its website’s archives. Facts It should be noted that these legal proceedings began in February 2013, with a formal notice being served by the Plaintiff. When La Presse refused to follow through with this formal notice, the Plaintiff introduced, three months later, the aforesaid motion. Moreover, it was only in July 2013 that the Plaintiff amended his motion to include an application for a safeguard order. In light of the foregoing, the case at bar dealt solely with the application for the safeguard order and the criteria needed for… Lire la suite
